August 8, 2022

EPA Seeks to Overhaul Clean Water Act 401 Certification Rule

BACK TO Knowledge Center

On June 1, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s administrator signed a proposed rule to change the Clean Water Act’s section 401 certification process. The proposed rule would replace existing regulations – known as the 2020 Rule – to be more consistent with the original Clean Water Act and clarify a certification practice that has evolved over the past 50 years.

Section 401 of the Clean Water Act provides that a federal agency may not issue a permit or license to conduct any activity that could result in a discharge into waters of the United States unless a Section 401 water quality certification is issued, or unless certification is waived. In 2020, in response to an executive order issued by President Trump, the EPA developed the Clean Water Act 401 Certification Rule (“the 2020 Rule”), which established procedures designed to promote consistent implementation of Section 401 and regulatory certainty in the federal licensing and permitting process.

In response to a challenge from tribes, environmentalists and states, including Oregon, the 2020 Rule was vacated and remanded by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Oregon Governor Kate Brown remarked of the 2020 Rule, “States and Tribes have relied on the Clean Water Act for almost 50 years to protect our waters and people, and EPA’s action is essential to restoring that historic authority. The [2020] rule was not only harmful to the environment, it was corrosive to state, federal, and Tribal partnerships.”

As a result of the District Court’s action vacating the 2020 Rule, the original 1971 water quality certification rules were to govern the Section 401 water quality certification process until EPA enacted new rules. However, in an emergency order on April 6, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a stay of the District Court’s order. As a result, the section 401 certification process is again governed by the 2020 Rule.

The 1971 rules are both substantively broader and procedurally simpler than the 2020 Rule. For example, the 2020 Rule:

  • Limits the definition of “water quality requirements” to only a few sections of the CWA
  • Requires that an applicant for a CWA permit request a pre-filing meeting with the certifying authority at least 30 days prior to submitting an application (the certifying authority was under no obligation to accept, or even respond to)
  • States that the “reasonable period of time” for the certifying authority to act on a request for certification could be determined either categorically or on a case-by-case basis, but was not to exceed one year. EPA has clarified in a guidance document that the “reasonable period of time” begins after receipt of a certification request has been documented received by a certifying authority.

In contrast, the 1971 rules contained no limitation on the definition of “water quality requirements,” no requirement for requesting a pre-filing meeting, and stated that the “reasonable period of time” for the certifying authority to act “shall generally be considered to be 6 months, but in any event shall not exceed 1 year.”

Given the modern trend towards process being the final product, it is likely that the new rule will require pre-filing meetings, allow determination of “reasonable time” on a case-by-case basis, and include other hoops through which applicants must jump if they hope to have a chance to move their projects forward. We recommend that parties who anticipate needing a 401 water quality certification keep a close eye on these developments and engage with the appropriate team of professionals to navigate the upcoming rulemaking process and its subsequent implementation.

In the meantime, we are monitoring the public comment period, which is open until August 8, and any other developments.

For more information on this topic please contact maureen.bayer@jordanramis.com

Tags: Environmental and Natural Resources, Water


Back to Top