Dirt Law


Washington Supreme Court: WDFW Has Authority Over Projects Above Ordinary High Water Marks

The Washington Supreme Court confirmed the jurisdictional scope of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) over hydraulic projects, as authorized under the Hydraulic Project Act (HPA).  So long as a statutorily defined hydraulic project “use[s], divert[s], obstruct[s], or…

How to Sufficiently Argue Your Land Use Appeal: Division III Clarifies Scope of “Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies” Requirement

The most important and often the most litigated issue under LUPA involves standing. With respect to standing, LUPA requires that the appellant satisfy four criteria.

SCOTUS: ESA Critical Habitat Designations Must Be “Habitat”; Remands on Whether Unoccupied and Unsuitable Area Can Be Designated as Critical Habitat for Dusky Gopher Frog

In a long-running, potentially monumental case regarding the scope of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), agency discretion and authority, and property rights, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously reversed the Fifth Circuit’s decision regarding the dusky gopher frog critical habitat designation.

WA Supreme Court Confirms Application Fees are Subject to LUPA and 21-day Appeal Period

Washington Supreme Court affirms that application fees, required as part of any standard land use or building permit application, are subject to the Land Use Petition Act’s (“LUPA”) judicial review process and the 21-day deadline for appeal.

No Construction Experience Required: A Team Builder Day with Habitat for Humanity

Jordan Ramis staff, friends, and colleagues spend a day helping to rebuild a house.

Hirst Decision

In a decision filed October 6, 2016 (no. 91475-3), the Washington Supreme Court held that local governments planning under the GMA cannot rely on Department of Ecology standards regarding exempted wells, but instead must require applicants for single family residences…

Mere Docketing Alone Does Not Constitute Consideration by the Governing Body

When the Growth Management Hearings Board (“GMHB”) rejected a challenge brought against City of West Richland, the challenger, Citizens for Smart Growth, appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed in an unpublished opinion, holding that in the context of comprehensive plan…

Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Shorter Statute of Ultimate Repose for Spec Homes

On February 19, 2016, the Oregon Supreme Court clarified which of two statutes of ultimate repose apply when a home is built on spec (i.e., “a house built without preexisting construction contracts in anticipation of eventual sale to the public”).…

Termination for Convenience in Oregon

There are often two options in a contract or subcontract for an owner to terminate a general contractor or for a general contractor to terminate a subcontractor:  termination for default or termination for convenience. The former is appropriate when the…

WOTUS Part 7: Far from Over

It has been some time since we have had reason to comment on the status of the numerous state challenges to the Environmental Protection Agency’s and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ controversial rule that newly defined the terms “Waters…

Back to Top